Loulou: Selected Extracts from the Journals of Lewis Harcourt (1880–1895)Edited by Patrick Johnson |
|||
|
Book Review In appending to his admirable life of Sir William Harcourt, published in 2004 (Harcourt and Son: A Political Biography of Sir William Harcourt, 1827–1904), a volume of extracts from the journals of Harcourt’s son and confidential coadjutor, Patrick Jackson is towing a cockle-boat in the wake of a battle cruiser. ‘ Loulou ’ Harcourt’s journals, running from 1880 (when he was seventeen) to 1895, with a five-year gap from 1887 to 1892, are primarily the record of his devoted service to his father’s career in the years when the latter was struggling to preserve the Liberal party from the centrifugal tendencies of Whigs and Radicals and from the consequences of Gladstone’s inability to let go and Rosebery’s to take hold. Accordingly, they were referred to substantially in the earlier work, so there is a certain familiarity about the important material these extracts contain on such subjects as the Irish question and the Liberal split over Home Rule, the death-throes of Gladstone’s last ministry, and the embarrassments of Rosebery’s brief reign. Jackson, however, has sought to maintain in his selection the balance of the original text between high politics and the more mundane aspects of its author’s life, with the result that the greatest interest of the book lies in the intimate glimpse it offers of the mentality and manners of an élite world, still complacent enough in imperial power ( ‘ Greece is to be coerced … Burmah is to be annexed ’ , the cabinet decided one afternoon in 1886) to be only a little stirred and not much shaken by Fenian attacks in London (Loulou bought a swordstick for himself and, appropriately, a ‘ British Bulldog ’ revolver for his father), by unemployed riots and the advent of the Independent Labour party, and by Gaiety girls and American heiresses (Loulou eventually married one), nibbling at the fringes of great families. Jackson dislikes Lewis Harcourt, ‘ cold blooded and calculating ’ , with ‘ no indications of any deep feelings, personal or religious ’ (except, presumably, for his father). Yet many of Loulou’s contemporaries liked him a great deal, and he was not without serious political views, tending further towards radicalism than did his father — he favoured graduated taxation long before its adoption in the 1894 budget. He was a shrewd and occasionally wry observer, witness his vignette of Henry Labouchere’s furious incomprehension of the Court’s refusal to have him in offi ce in 1892: ‘ [They] can’t prove I ever said anything personally against the Royal Family except that the heir apparent was the associate of swindlers and prostitutes … ’ . The sudden, unexplained ending of his journals in 1895 leaves him, aged thirty-two, still bobbing behind his father, but he would later fi gure signifi cantly in the Liberal party as a cabinet minister under Campbell-Bannerman and Asquith and one of the opponents of British intervention in 1914, and it is a pity Jackson did not enlarge his very brief introduction to give some account of Harcourt’s post-1895 career, building on his contribution to the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, to which this volume surprisingly neglects to refer its readers.
|
TO ORDER BOOKS: TO REQUEST A CATALOGUE: TO RECEIVE UPDATES ON NEWLY RELEASED TITLES BY EMAIL:
|
|
| Copyright © 2008, Fairleigh Dickinson University. All rights reserved. Information on FDU web pages is provided as a convenience for the University community and others seeking information. It is the responsibility of the visitor to verify the information. This page originally created with FDU Pagetoaster 2. [Latest update 080906] Print page. Click to see how'd they do that? |