The Idea of Comedy: History, Theory, Critique
Jan Walsh Hokenson

About FDU Press

New Releases

Publications by Topic

Recent Book Reviews

Book Reviews by Topic

Submission Guidelines

This book intertwines studding erudition, acute insight, and searching examination. Hokenson does not shy away from polemics, many of which are found even in the midst of its most painstaking scholarly portions. The reader will find herself learning something on virtually every page, and also reacting—most often with agreement, but also with disagreement. Perhaps even the book’s apparent innocuous title surprisingly proves to be provocative. The very idea of comedy, in this postmodern and even post-postmodernism era (Hokenson calls the latter “transmodern”) tends to cause some amount of incredibility. Yet she insists upon the term, employing Wittgenstein’s doctrine of family resemblances as a way to gather the many and disparate strains.

The task she sets for herself could hardly be more ambitious: “to bring into panoptic view the wide landscape of comic theory as a terrain of thought extending from antique to contemporary conceptions” (14). Hokenson melds textual history, philosophical observation, and critical appraisal as she maps this terrain with both richness and subtlety. Every chapter could serve as an intriguing and substantial book synopsis on its own.

An outline of the history of comic theory from the classical to the modern period (which she dates to the mid-twentieth century) is presented in her first chapter. While one can find quarrels with her approach (for example, her literal reading of Plato’s Republic on mimesis seems no longer sustainable, at least to me), the chapter charts what might be called a historic-topographic map. As such, it sets out the principal locations of comic theory, its major texts, their animating notions, and their temporal placement. A major component of her overarching view is the enormous influence of Aristotle’s denigration of Aristophanes and “vulgar” comedy upon most subsequent comic theory.

Her second chapter, “The Dominant Modernist Conception of Comedy Premises and Elisions,” observes that “the modernist dominant is highly theoretical, that is, it is much more interested in elaborating a global theory—edging into ideology—than in questioning its reach” (101). She explores the sources that culminate in her discernment of this conception, which conjoins incongruity with elements of the Freudian (and Jungian) unconscious. In light of this, she comments upon many influential texts that employ these elements.

”The Late Modernist Conception of Comedy: Premise and Elisions” is her third chapter. It begins by noting a peculiar omission in comic theory: “For centuries, no comic writer ever ignored medieval comic modes . . . but critical theorists and commentators surely did” (109). Many late modernist theorists resuscitated populist comic themes and, working on the premise of the opposition of the comic character to society, reinstalled some of the exuberance of Old Comedy. But these theorists elide the medieval Fool.

The next chapter, “Twin Modernist Elisions,” responds directly to this omission of medieval texts and of the medieval Fool from comic theory, however. In splendid description and argument, Hokenson concludes that the latter cannot be captured by any of the modernist theories, then hastens to add, “I hold no brief for the fool, except as a wedge issue” (170). However, given the élan with which she describes him, it is my guess that this disclaimer only applies to Hokenson the scholar.

I doubt whether postmodernists would look kindly on the title of chapter 5, “The Interlude of Postmodernist Conceptions.” While the modernists’ difficulty lay in fitting a large number of texts into their global theories, Hokenson claims that the postmodernists “rarely seek to avoid [this problem] by discussion of large numbers of comic texts,” opting instead to select a very few and only those that match their philosophical view (193). According to this view, only language holds sway, and there is no real “I” or “we.” She sees these primarily French writers (Hokenson’s first expertise is French language and literature) as “extreme refinements of the populist view,” except that here theory itself is insurgent (204).

Her concluding sixth chapter, entitled “Comedy in Contemporary Thought,” briefly treats promising recent developments that aim to provide a connection to comic texts that was lacking in postmodernism. Aesthetics returns again to comic theory, though hardly in traditional ways. In this chapter, she discusses various extensions of earlier theories, feminist theories, and theories that return to reason and system as a way to understand what belongs to comedy and the spectator’s response to it.

Hokenson’s epilogue credits contemporaries with beginning to restore unity to the splintering of comic theory by aiming toward a “critical canon,” the members of which she calls “parts of a discursive whole” (265). This is hardly an uncontestable conclusion, but there is no doubt that any contestant would need to marshal much energy and spirit, as well as much learning and thought, to cross swords with Hokenson. I recommend laughing along with her instead.

Bernard Freydberg, Comparative Literature Studies, Vol. 44, No. 3, 2007

Hokenson (classics, French, comparative literature, and women’s studies, Florida Atlantic Univ.) is dead serious about comedy, and here she traces the history of its criticism and explores the interface between societies and their “construction” of “the comic.” Unlike Umberto Ecco, who uses humor to explore comedy in The Name of the Rose and Misunderstandings, Hokenson prefers to construct a weighty, scholarly, sweeping historical perspective, and from this vantage point she examines critical theorists from Aristotle and Aristophanes to Freud, Bergson, and Elaine Scary. Several chapters, for example, “Twin Modernist Elisions,” engage in modish modernist bashing, but in other chapters Hokenson uncovers what she calls “the butts” of subjectivity and reason. The epilogue is a tour de force, summarizing the last 15 extraordinarily productive years of comic theory. A good complement to V. Ulea’s A Concept of Dramatic Genre and the Comedy of a New Type (2002), Susan Purdie’s Comedy: The Mastery of Discourse (1993), M. S. Silk’s Aristophanes and the Definition of Comedy (2000), and James McGlew’s Citizen’s on Stage (2002), this book is eloquent and precise on classical literature. It travels two and a half millennia, over acres of literatures, a trip that those with stamina will undertake and enjoy. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty.

R. H. Soloman, formerly, University of Alberta, Choice, October 2006

Read more

To see a full description of this book, search our online database

2010 Eastpark Boulevard
Cranbury, New Jersey 08512
Phone (609) 655-4770
Fax (609) 655-8366

285 Madison Avenue
Madison, New Jersey 07940
Phone (973) 443-8564
Fax (973) 443-8364


Copyright © 2007, Fairleigh Dickinson University. All rights reserved. Information on FDU web pages is provided as a convenience for the University community and others seeking information. It is the responsibility of the visitor to verify the information. This page originally created with FDU Pagetoaster 2. [Latest update 080129] Print page. Click to see how'd they do that?
Click if you are the owner and you wish to edit this page